home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- FROM THE PUBLISHER, Page 6
-
-
-
- "This is like The Perils of Pauline," Richard Darman joked
- on the phone last Friday morning, only hours after his plan for
- reducing the federal deficit had gone down to a resounding
- defeat in the House of Representatives. At the other end of the
- line was Michael Duffy, one of TIME's two White House
- correspondents, who has been following the talks and the Budget
- Director's role in them since last May.
-
- Darman's lighthearted remark was exactly the kind of comment
- Duffy has come to expect from the man who once donned a gorilla
- suit to celebrate the President's birthday. Darman has a habit
- of leavening even the darkest moments with humor. Throughout
- the budget talks, Darman's spirits were often at their highest
- when the odds of forging the deal seemed longest. Or, Duffy
- wondered, was it merely nervous anxiety? Did Darman, the master
- strategist, know how it would all turn out? Or was he making
- it up as he went along?
-
- It was precisely questions of this kind that led us to focus
- our reporting on Darman's role in the budget battle. To track
- the negotiations behind the scenes, Duffy interviewed dozens
- of officials from both the Administration and Congress, and had
- several sessions with Darman in his office. Duffy found the
- interviews with Darman "the most challenging of my career"
- because the Budget Director relishes a thoroughgoing
- exploration of every topic, rarely letting a question go by
- without examining its premises in depth.
-
- Duffy's conclusion after all those discussions: "The budget
- summit was a big roll of the dice for Darman. He was either
- going to succeed greatly or fail greatly."
-
- For Duffy, the Darman story was a natural assignment. A
- correspondent in TIME's Washington bureau for five years, he
- reported on budget battles as a congressional correspondent in
- 1986 and 1987. When he and TIME's Dan Goodgame teamed up to
- cover the White House after Bush's election, watching Bush
- disentangle himself from his no-new-taxes campaign pledge
- became a favorite pastime. "It was obvious that Bush would have
- to reverse himself sometime," said Duffy last week, "and it was
- also obvious that Darman would call the shots."
-
-
- -- Louis A. Weil III
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-